·
May 26, 2023
Positive and Negative Friction in UI/UX Design
Why good design does not always mean removing every obstacle
In product design, “reducing friction” is often treated as a universal goal. Faster flows, fewer steps, minimal clicks. While this instinct is valid, it is incomplete.
Not all friction is bad. And not all smoothness is good.
The real skill in UI/UX design lies in knowing when to remove friction and when to introduce it intentionally. This distinction is often described as negative friction versus positive friction.
What Is Friction in UX?
Friction refers to anything that slows down or complicates a user’s path toward a goal.
That complication can be:
an extra step
a pause
a confirmation
a moment of attention or decision
Whether that friction improves or harms the experience depends entirely on context and intent.
Positive Friction
When slowing the user down helps them
Positive friction is intentional resistance designed to protect users, prevent errors, or encourage thoughtful decisions.
It interrupts autopilot behavior at moments where consequences matter.
Why positive friction exists
Humans often operate on habit. In high-stakes or irreversible actions, speed can become dangerous. Positive friction creates a moment of awareness.
It says:
“Pause. This matters.”
Examples of Positive Friction
1. Confirming important actions
In banking or payment apps, users are often shown a final summary before completing a transaction. Amount, recipient, payment method.
This extra step technically slows the process. But it prevents costly mistakes, builds trust, and reassures users that they are in control.
Removing this step would make the flow faster but riskier.
2. Review screens before irreversible actions
Think of deleting an account, closing a bank account, or submitting a tax form.
A confirmation dialog that clearly explains the consequence is positive friction. It reduces accidental actions and protects users from irreversible regret.
3. Autofill with review, not blind submission
Autopopulating address or card details speeds things up, but good systems still ask users to review the information.
The friction is subtle. You are not re-entering data, but you are encouraged to verify it.
This balances efficiency with accuracy.
4. Multiple payment options presented clearly
Offering credit cards, UPI, wallets, and platform-based payments introduces a choice point.
This is friction, but it benefits users by giving them control and flexibility. The key is clarity, not speed at all costs.
5. Progress indicators in complex flows
A progress bar during checkout or onboarding does not speed up the process. It adds a moment of orientation.
It answers an important question:
“How much more is left?”
This reduces anxiety and improves completion rates, even though it technically adds UI elements and cognitive steps.
Negative Friction
When difficulty works against the user
Negative friction is unintentional resistance that adds effort without providing value.
It frustrates, confuses, or exhausts users.
Negative friction does not protect users. It punishes them.
Why negative friction happens
Legacy systems
Poor performance
Over-engineered security
Unnecessary business rules
Lack of empathy for real usage contexts
Examples of Negative Friction
1. Waiting without feedback
A loading screen with no indication of progress creates anxiety.
Users do not know if the system is working or frozen. Time feels longer when there is uncertainty.
The friction adds no value.
2. Slow checkout flows
If each step in checkout takes too long to load, users experience friction at every transition.
The task feels heavier than it is. Many users abandon the flow, not because it is complex, but because it feels sluggish.
3. Too many steps for simple actions
Forcing users through multiple screens to perform a simple task, such as updating a phone number or paying a bill, creates unnecessary effort.
The friction is not protecting anyone. It is simply inefficient.
4. Experiences that feel disconnected
When a payment flow suddenly opens a new page, changes visual language, or feels like a different product altogether, users lose trust.
This friction comes from inconsistency, not intentional design.
5. Excessive cognitive burden
Requiring multiple PINs, passwords, or verification codes for routine actions overwhelms users.
Security is important, but piling complexity without context increases mental strain and leads to workarounds or abandonment.
The Core Difference
The difference between positive and negative friction is intent.
Positive friction is deliberate
Negative friction is accidental or careless
Positive friction answers a user need:
safety
clarity
confidence
control
Negative friction serves no user need and often exists because the system was not designed around real behavior.
A Simple Mental Model
Before adding or removing friction, ask:
What mistake does this prevent?
What clarity does this add?
What anxiety does this reduce?
What value does the user gain from slowing down here?
If you cannot answer these questions, the friction is probably negative.
Final Thought
Great UX is not about making everything fast.
It is about making the right things deliberate and the unnecessary things disappear.
Design maturity shows not in how aggressively friction is removed, but in how thoughtfully it is placed.
Sometimes, the best user experience is not the smoothest one, but the most considerate one.